Psychiatry in Forensic Contexts
Duration
- One Semester or equivalent
Contact hours
- 16 hours Weekend Workshop
On-campus unit delivery combines face-to-face and digital learning. For Online unit delivery, learning is conducted exclusively online.
Prerequisites
All students must be enrolled as Psychiatric registrars, or be accredited as consultant psychiatristsAims and objectives
2. Effectively assist courts and tribunals and decision making bodies in dealing with matters where psychiatry is relevant
3. Examine the theoretical and historic basis of medico-legal constructs encountered in forensic psychiatry
4. Apply the evidence base to enhance effective and ethical practice of psychiatry in forensic settings
Unit information in detail
- Teaching methods, assessment, general skills outcomes and content.
Teaching methods
This Unit will involve up to 150 hours of work including:
Type (On-campus) | Hours per week | Number of Weeks | Total |
Face to Face Contact Workshop | 16 (2 day weekend in Week 6) | 1 | 16 |
Online Contact | N/A | ||
Specified Learning Activities Discussion boards, Readings, Quizzes | 4 | 12 | 48 |
Unspecified Learning Activities Independent study, assessment preparation | Recommended | 84 | |
TOTAL | 148 hours/12.5cp |
Assessment
Types | Individual or Group task | Weighting | Assesses attainment of these ULOs |
Online Examination | Individual | 40% | 1, 3, 4 |
Assignment | Individual | 25% | 1, 2, 4 |
Literature review | Individual | 35% | 3, 4 |
General skills outcomes
- Problem solving skills
- Analysis skills
- Communication skills
- Ability to tackle unfamiliar problems
Content
• Risk Assessment and Management in forensic settings
• Criminal procedures
• Civil procedures
• Roles and responsibilities of the expert witness
• Writing a court report
• The management of sexual offending as a medico-legal issue
Study resources
- References.
References
Otto, R.K., DeMier, R.L. & Boccaccini, M.T. (2014) Forensic Reports and Testimony: A Guide to Effective Communication
for Psychologists and Psychiatrists; Wiley
Greenberg, S. A., & Shuman, D. W. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional
Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(1), 50-57. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.28.1.50McSherry, B. M., Legal
Capacity Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2012). Journal of Law and Medicine.
20:22-27
Kinner, S., Harvey, C., Hamilton, B., Brophy, L., Roper, C., McSherry, B., & Young, J. (2017). Attitudes towards seclusion
and restraint in mental health settings: Findings from a large, community-based survey of consumers, carers and
mental health professionals. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 26(5), 535-544.
doi:10.1017/S2045796016000585
Perlin, M.L. (2014). “The ladder of the law has no top and no bottom”: How therapeutic jurisprudence can give life to
international human rights, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, (37) 6, p 535-542,
DOI.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.026.