Google’s threat proves legislation matters

Google has threatened to pull its search engine from Australia if the news media bargaining code comes into effect.
In summary
Dr Belinda Barnet explains why Google’s threat proves legislation matters in her speech to the Senate inquiry into Australia’s news media bargaining code
My name is Belinda Barnet, I’m a senior lecturer in media at Swinburne University of Technology. I’ve spent 20 years researching, writing about and making digital media and have published a book on the history of hypertext.
I’ve looked closely at the history and invention of hyperlinks and how they work in particular.
I’m going to address just one thing today, and it is an argument that has been put to you several times now in a few different forms, most recently in an ad campaign by Google.
It is the idea that this legislation will “break” the way the web works.
As you have heard, when the web was conceived decades ago it was indeed based on some fundamental principles of freedom and openness, transparency, and open linking.
But that is not the web we have anymore. That’s why I want to respond to this argument.
Rather than a decentralised, equitable space, we now have a web that is controlled by a couple of major platforms who trade in your data. That is the reality.
Links from or in these platforms, particularly Google and Facebook, are not “free”, not in the sense that they were when first implemented on computer screens.
They cost you something: the price is your data. Just hovering over an article or a snippet or any piece of content on these platforms costs you data.
And they are the gatekeepers of the internet. Australians don’t get a choice about this.
They like to keep us on their products.
Facebook, for example, is essentially a walled garden that many of us don’t even leave once we’re on it: it’s designed that way. The antithesis of an open web.
Now, Google also claims that “paying for links breaks the way that search works”.
This is disingenuous at best and misinformation at worst.
If extracting payment for links, or views, or clicks, or snippets, is breaking search--they’ve already broken it. These platforms have been extracting data for every click and scroll and hover for years now. From you.
Then they charge advertisers to place advertising based on that data. As in, they sell links. It’s how they make money.
You might argue that the web began to change the moment cookies were used, or when javascript was invented shortly after that.
Either way, the argument that this bargaining code will “break” the open web is based on a false premise. The claim that it will “break” free search is based on a false premise.
The premise is that what we currently have is free - or equitable
For most Australians, it is not. We need to look at the reality.
If we are to move towards a future where the web is truly open, then we first need to address the major power imbalance between these platforms and every other citizen of the web.
The dice are loaded in Google and Facebook’s favour. It was not always so.
Legislation is needed here. Regulation is needed here.
Before I finish: if anyone is still seduced by the argument that “this legislation will break the open web or break search”, and you feel I have not sufficiently addressed it, you could also just remove mention of links from the legislation and stick with pay to reproduce, view, or display content.
Be aware, though, that Google and Facebook may then remove snippets and summaries entirely and just display links.
So: this code will not break things. I believe it will be beneficial for our media industry. Thank you.
View a detailed transcript of the Senate hearing.
-
Media Enquiries
Related articles
-
- Health
New research to explore effects of COVID-19 on young people’s mental health
Researchers from Swinburne and QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute have launched a survey investigating how COVID-19 has affected the mental health of Australian young people
Thursday 01 April 2021 -
- Social Affairs
- Design
This is how we create the age-friendly smart city
Director of Swinburne’s Future Self and Design Living Lab, Associate Professor Sonja Pedell discusses how city environments can be designed to meet the needs and personal goals of older Australians
Friday 05 March 2021 -
- Health
Swinburne researchers conduct largest investigation into cognitive functioning in body dysmorphic disorder
A new study published by researchers from Swinburne’s Centre for Mental Health show that only a small subgroup of individuals with body dysmorphic disorder experience difficulties with cognitive functioning
Thursday 18 March 2021 -
- Social Affairs
Indigenous Voice: co-design for community representation
A webinar featuring Swinburne’s Dr Emma Lee from the Centre for Social Impact discussed the opportunities and challenges of an Indigenous Voice.
Thursday 18 March 2021 -
- Film and television
‘Rape-revenge’ films are changing: they now focus on the women, instead of their dads
Cinema and screen studies PhD candidate, Isobella Austin discusses how narratives around sexual assault in Hollywood are changing – both on and off screen
Friday 19 February 2021