The Australian Government’s new energy roadmap includes a plan to produce ‘low carbon steel’. Is this just a buzz word or some pipe dream?
Steel is one of the most important materials used by humanity, utilised in everything from trains to cutlery. Last year, we produced over 1860 megatonnes of steel in the world, dwarfing the second most used metal in the world, aluminium by a factor of 30. Steel is very useful, but its production also generates nearly 1.9 tonnes of carbon dioxide for every tonne of steel produced and accounts for up to five per cent of total world carbon dioxide emissions.
Clearly, reducing the carbon dioxide emissions of steel would be important in the shift to a low carbon economy and most significant to Australia with our giant iron ore and coal industry.
Why is low-carbon steel important?
The great majority of the world’s steel is produced from ore using the blast furnace route to produce iron and oxygen steelmaking to make steel from the iron. In this two-step process, the carbon (in the form of coke) provides both the energy to fuel the production of iron but also to chemically remove the oxygen from the iron ore to produce iron and carbon dioxide. Carbon plays some role in the steelmaking process, but the great majority of carbon dioxide generated is in this ironmaking stage.
Simply put, if we can replace carbon in the ironmaking stage of the process, we would largely de-carburise (remove the carbon from) the steelmaking process and ‘low-carbon steel’ would not just be a politician’s buzz word.
Can low-carbon steel be achieved?
There is some very good news on this front. Yes, hydrogen can be used to replace carbon. In fact, it has been demonstrated at industrial scale that hydrogen can entirely place carbon as a fuel and reactant to remove oxygen in the ironmaking process. As recently as 2005, a plant operated in Trinidad and Tobago produced several hundred thousand tonnes of iron made from Hydrogen and this was successfully converted into commercial grade steel.
Now the bad news (or at least the complicated part).
Whilst this is technical feasible, there are several serious barriers to this becoming the new way to make steel namely:
- The current dominant technology for making iron, the blast furnace, is not necessarily suitable for the hydrogen production of iron, and so with so much investment in that technology, changing to another technology would be economically difficult for industry.
- The technology that is most easily adapted to hydrogen is direct reduced ironmaking (DRI) of which there are several variants. This technology is not suited to dealing with high gangue ores (unwanted minerals or other material in which valuable minerals are found), that are common around the world, so the introduction of hydrogen DRI production would also be challenging to the iron ore industry and likely to lead extra costs and energy in the subsequent steelmaking step.
- Current ‘green’ routes to making hydrogen (i.e. using renewable energy) are themselves expensive and not currently anywhere near the scale of hydrogen production required by steel plants.
- The so called ‘grey’ route for making hydrogen (i.e. using natural gas as the feedstock) is currently less expensive than green production but also generate significant carbon dioxide. Some industry experts advocate that the grey route is a good intermediate while renewables and electrolysis technology for mass production of hydrogen are developed.
There are significant research programs in the EU, North America and emerging in Australia to address these issues. In my own laboratories at Swinburne, we have active projects looking at these different aspects of the potential hydrogen revolution for metal production. These projects require not only scientific investigation of how hydrogen behaves at high temperature with different ores, but also techno-economic analysis of different options. Any shift to low-carbon steel will require both technical and economic know-how.
In summary, ‘low-carbon steel’ is not a silly buzzword. One of the world’s major industries could be effectively decarburised but there are significant technical and economic hurdles that need to be addressed.