Taking the pulse of a city: Melbourne's Vital Signs
Monday 16 October 2017
Analysis for The Conversation by Catherine Brown, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Business & Law, Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology.
Vital Signs takes stock of all the key elements of a city’s successes and challenges, and the Melbourne Lord Mayor’s Charitable Foundation uses this data to guide its grant-making. Lord Mayor's Charitable Foundation Catherine Brown, Swinburne University of Technology
Vital Signs is a report that gathers good-quality data about a city from reputable sources to provide a snapshot of its community. Vital Signs identifies things to celebrate and things to improve.
The Toronto Community Foundation produced the first Vital Signs report in 2006. This was so well received that it led to more than 30 community foundations undertaking the Vital Signs project across Canada, led by Community Foundations of Canada.
I first saw Toronto’s 2006 Vital Signs through my earlier advisory work for community foundations around Australia. I was hugely impressed and could see the value of an independent set of data to check a community’s health and wellbeing.
When I was appointed CEO of the Lord Mayor’s Charitable Foundation, essentially Melbourne’s own community foundation, producing Vital Signs was a potential opportunity.
Community foundations provide grants for charitable purposes and often work collaboratively, using their knowledge and networks to help make a difference. The Vital Signs report provides us with up-to-date data on which to base decisions about our granting priorities.
Most importantly, the reports are intended to assist other foundations, leaders of not-for-profit organisations and policymakers working on the various issues.
So, what did we find in Greater Melbourne Vital Signs 2017?
What can we celebrate about our city?
An impressive 95% of residents participate in or attend arts and cultural events.
What are Melbourne’s biggest challenges?
Homelessness and the lack of affordable housing remain big challenges for Melbourne. The median price of housing across Greater Melbourne has increased by 19% in the last five years. A person living on income support payments can afford only 0.7% of private rental properties.
Despite much higher school completion rates than 50 years ago, youth unemployment is too high at 13.5% of young people (aged 15-24 years). Only one-third of graduates seeking full-time employment were able to find a job within four months. Underemployment of young people is even more significant at 18%; the highest since records began.
Another concern is the report that one in five people (20%) reported experiencing discrimination based on skin colour, ethnic origin or religion. This is up from 15% in 2015. This is particularly concerning given that 34% of our population was born outside Australia and nearly 1.5 million people speak a language other than English at home.
Our greenhouse gas emissions are around four times the global average. However, rooftop solar is rapidly increasing – although we sit at 14% residential uptake compared with Queensland at 29%, Western Australia at 23.1% and South Australia at 28.8%. We need to reduce our waste, which is increasing, although 44% is recycled or recovered.
Which challenges should philanthropy target?
Philanthropy occupies a unique place in the Melbourne community. Foundations can take a long-term view, outside of election and annual meeting cycles. We can support innovative responses, sometimes testing and proving new services and programs before government can fund them or a social enterprise model can become sustainable.
Philanthropy can try to tackle the tough issues. Philanthropy can work in partnership with government and business and bring sectors together. Sometimes it makes most sense for government or business to take a lead.
Overall, we are a well-educated, arts-oriented city. We are doing well conserving water and improving air quality.
However, we must tackle the lack of affordable housing, reduce youth unemployment, protect our waterways and our food bowl, and actively support social inclusion. And more people need to be more active.
Many of these challenges can be reduced if we take a proactive approach as a community, collaborating across sectors. We will continue to work with our partners on:
- reducing homelessness and increasing the supply of more affordable housing
- reducing youth unemployment in a changing world of work
- reducing discrimination in a culturally diverse community
- ensuring a sustainable food bowl and healthy waterways
- reducing our level of waste
- supporting our community to prepare for and recover from heatwaves and other natural disasters such as fires and droughts, especially those most at risk such as children and older people or those with limited financial resources.
Guided by the evidence
Many foundations around the world are increasingly using evidence to inform their granting and other programs.
Community foundations like the Lord Mayor’s Charitable Foundation are a hub for charitable giving and granting in a particular community. They are focused on the key issues facing our communities and also on growing philanthropy.
Our Greater Melbourne Vital Signs 2017 report is designed around some general population information about the greater Melbourne community and the impact areas around which the foundation’s grants program is organised: education and employment; healthy and cohesive communities; homelessness and affordable housing; and environment and sustainability.
We bring diverse players together to a safe, independent space to think creatively about community challenges and new solutions.
Our first Melbourne Vital Signs was produced in 2014 with academic research and advice from Community Indicators Victoria at the University of Melbourne.
The 2017 Vital Signs report, our second, has involved a wider group of academic advisers from the University of Melbourne (Transforming Housing, Victorian Eco Innovation Lab), Victoria University (Mitchell Institute) and Monash University (Climate Works). Two of our team, Dan Pediaditis and Kelly Sparke, undertook additional research and data analysis.
The advisory committee members are listed on the back cover of the full report and we are very appreciative of their advice and commitment. A full list of research sources, 97 in all, is included in the report.
Written by Catherine Brown, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Business & Law, Centre for Social Impact, Swinburne University of Technology. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.