Smart Water Fund Research Grant
Geotechnical Characteristics of Biosolids and their Suitability as Stabilized Fill
-
Milestone 7
Final Evaluation Report | 3.04 MB
Project Outcomes
Laboratory Testing
Extensive geotechnical laboratory tests were subsequently conducted at Swinburne University of Technology. The tests included triaxial shear strength, consolidation tests with oedometers, consolidation tests with Rowe cells, permeability tests, compaction tests, California bearing ratio (CBR) tests, grain size distribution, atterberg limits, moisture content and other geotechnical tests to assess the geotechnical characteristics of stabilised biosolids as a fill material.
The biosolids samples are classified as organic fined-grained soils of medium to high plasticity with a group symbol of ?H?as per Australian standard for the geotechnical site investigation (AS 1276, 1993). The biosolids samples contain approximately 5% gravel size, 50% sand size, 40% silt size and 5% clay sized particles.
The shear strength test results from the laboratory triaxial tests indicate that the biosolids stabilised with the required proportions of additives possess sufficient shear strength to make them suitable for use as fill material. The CBR values of biosolids stabilised with a minimum of 5% lime, 3% cement, 3% bauxsol and 30% crushed brick satisfies the VicRoads specification for Type B fill material which requires a minimum CBR of 2%.
Finite Element Modelling
Finite element analysis was conducted to analyse the behaviour of an embankment using biosolids stabilised with lime, cement, bauxsol or crushed brick, as well as untreated biosolids. The residual settlement of the biosolids stabilised with various additives including lime (5%), cement (3%, 5%), bauxsol (3%, 5%) and crushed brick (30%, 40%, 50%) were found to be within VicRoad? residual settlement requirement of a maximum of 50 mm over a period of 20 years after 6 months of preloading.
The results of the finite element analysis agree well with the laboratory results and indicate that biosolids, when stabilised with additives to the required percentages, can be used as stabilised fill in embankments. To negate the effect of long term decomposition of organic matter in biosolids, the maximum allowable total thickness of the stabilised biosolids within a road embankment should be limited to 0.5 m. Use of an impermeable geomembrane separator or 0.5 m impermeable clay layer is recommended to encapsulate the biosolids and prevent any seepage or leaching of biosolids into the fill material. The cost of encapsulating the stabilised biosolids with a geomembrane or clay liner is minimal as the geomembrane or clay liner has been included solely for separation purposes.
Technical Note
A technical note has been developed to provide standard best practice for the usage of biosolids as stabilised fill in embankments. Due to the nature of the material, occupational health and safety measures, suitable transportation, controlled storage, site management and environmental management controls have been outlined in this technical note. Biosolids should be stabilised with one of the following additives to the specified minimum mix proportions:
- lime (5%), cement (3%), bauxsol (3%), 20 mm crushed brick (30%);
In addition, a brief has been prepared for the construction of future instrumented trial embankments to confirm the expected settlement of the stabilised biosolids when used as embankment fill and to compare this with the laboratory testing and finite element modelling results. An estimate of the cost of the stabilised trial embankments has also been included and was found to be only marginally higher than that of a traditional embankment without biosolids.
The project was completed in September 2009.
Contact
- Name
- Assoc Prof. Arul Arulrajah
- Department
- Centre for Sustainable Infrastructure
- Telephone
- +61 3 9214 5741
- aarulrajah@swin.edu.au
Funding sources
